International Society of Biomechanics
Gold sponsor

About Us

  • Note from the President, Mary Rodgers
  • Results of the Council Election 2005
  • Presentation of ISBS, Eadric Bressel
  • Interview with the student representative, Karen Søgaard
  • Notes from the archives, John Challis
  • Editors notes, Karen Søgaard
  • Latest news ISB/ASB Conference Cleveland 2005
  • Leaving abstract submissions until the last minute!, Anthony Brown and Brian L Davis
  • Y-Robot Award, Savio L-Y. Woo
  • ISB Travel Grant, Christelle Chaux
  • ISB Travel Grant, Yan Yang
  • ISB Dissertation Grant Report, Ajay Seth
  • ISB Dissertation Grant Report, Markus Dettwyler
  • ISB Travel Grant Report, Federico Formanti
  • ISB Travel Grant Report, Greg Sawicki
  • ISB Travel Grant Report, J. Maxwell Donelan
  • ISB Dissertation Grant Report 2004, Kathleen Shyhalla
  • ISB Dissertation Grant Report 2003, Jean-Marie Steeve Lamvohee
  • 5th World Congress of Biomechanics
  • Upcoming Meetings, Workshops
  • New Members to ISB

 


 

 

For a copy of the screen version click the "Print" link at right. A PDF version is also available in the traditional double column format and can be downloaded here:   nl96.pdf 3.22 MB .


 

Note from the President

I can’t believe that two years have passed by so quickly. It seems like just yesterday I began to serve as President of the International Society of Biomechanics. As I prepare to turn over the Presidential responsibilities to incoming President Brian Davis at the XXth ISB Congress in Cleveland , I am astounded at the many transitions that have occurred during my watch.

I have had the good fortune to be working with an excellent group of council members from all over the world who have shared a vision for global facilitation of biomechanics. During this time, we have seen the newsletter go from a paper to electronic format. We have had the first electronic election in ISB’s history. And two more societies have become affiliated with ISB. In the last newsletter, we featured the Brazilian society and have a feature on the International Society of Biomechanics in Sport in this newsletter. Our work with affiliated and developing countries has been expanded through the efforts of Jill McNitt-Gray.

In addition, we now have our first elected student representative on the ISB council. Motoshi Kaya was appointed in 2003 and has helped to facilitate this election. We look forward to working with Cheryl Metcalf to expand ISB student involvement. See an interview with Cheryl in this newsletter

Many thanks go to the outgoing council members for their hard work on behalf of ISB. Sandra Olney is finishing her term as Past-President. She did an excellent job of selecting the Muybridge Award winner and providing an impressive slate of candidates for this year’s election. I enjoyed serving on the Muybridge Award Committee with her. Senshi Fukashiro was an appointed member of the Council who liaised with Asian sponsors, assisting Mark Grabiner with ISB sponsorship. Bob Gregor did a top-notch job of updating the codes and constitution. Several constitutional changes were presented to the membership and voted in.

As we say goodbye to some, it’s time to greet others as well. We welcome new members Toshio Moritani (Japan); Peter Milburn (New Zealand); John Challis (USA); Frans van der Helm (the Netherlands); and Cheryl Metcalf (United Kingdom).

When I look back over the past year, I am proud of what we as a Society have accomplished. As for my activities as President, I called and presided over the meeting of the Executive Council held in conjunction with the 2004 ESB conference in the Netherlands last July 3 and 4. I also will call the Council meetings just prior to the opening of the 2005 biennial Congress (at which my term of office expires) as well as a meeting of the General Assembly of members.

Also as President, I have provided guidance to President-Elect Brian Davis in overseeing the planning and conduct of the 2005 International Congress. I worked with him to insure a smooth transition to the next administration and proper continuity of Society business.

With the President-Elect and Past-President, I served as a member of the Committee of Presidents of the Executive Council to make decisions on urgent business that may arise between scheduled Council meetings; I communicated with Executive Council members regarding their duties and discussed specific issues with them, and I corresponded regularly with the elected Executive Council members in order to keep them informed of new developments of concern to the Society and encouraged them in their individual and collective efforts regarding Society responsibilities.

In matters of Society policy, I spoke for the Executive Council, and I served as Chief Public Relations Officer of the Society. We had continuing communication regarding the transition to electronic elections and newsletters along with the Web site transitions. Based on the feedback from the Council, the following financial commitment was made related to the ISB student representative: The incoming and outgoing student representatives will receive up to $500 to attend the Council meeting at the ISB conference. The student representative will also receive up to $500 to attend the Council meeting in the non-conference year.

This year, I also represented the Society in all communications with other scientific and professional organizations, specifically Elsevier, ESB, WCB, and others.

Finally, I worked closely with Karen Sogaard in gathering material for the Society newsletter and provided guidance as well. It has been a pleasure to work with her.

Regarding this newsletter, there are a lot of important topics covered, and I hope you take the time to read them. Just some of these are Notes from the Archives, the Announcement of the Y-robot award, the program from World biomechanics and the results from the Council election. Reports from the student biomechanists awarded Travel Grants, Congress grants, and dissertation grants are also in this newsletter. Something not to be missed is the update on the ISB Cleveland 2005 conference. Our biennial international conference on biomechanics is so important because it provides us with the opportunity to gain an understanding of the current status of the field while making valuable professional and personal contacts. The conference will be held this August in Cleveland , Ohio , USA . Please read about the conference and plan on attending.

Now it’s time for me to bid you farewell—as President at least. These past two years have been remarkable for me. I have learned so much and shared so much. I’ve had the opportunity to work with some of the finest people in our field, and together we have been able to make important changes that will help strengthen our organization. We’ve worked hard to ensure that the future of biomechanics will be a bright and promising one. Thank you for giving me these opportunities.

It has been an honor and privilege to serve as your President. I look forward to seeing you in Cleveland !

Until next time

Mary Rodgers


Results of the Council Election 2005

ImagePresident-Elect:

Walter Herzog, Ph.D. ( Canada )

Council Members:

Maarten F. Bobbert, Ph.D. (The Netherlands )

Joseph Hamill, Ph.D. ( U.S.A. )

Jill McNitt-Gray, Ph.D. (USA)

Karen Søgaard, Ph.D (Denmark)

Alex Stacoff, Ph.D. (Switzerland)

Toshio Moritani, Ph.D. (Japan)

Peter Milburn, Ph.D. ( New Zealand )

Ewald Hennig, Ph,D. ( Germany )

John H. Challis, Ph.D. ( U.S.A. )

Frans C.T. van der Helm, Ph.D. (The Netherlands)

Student Member:

Cheryl Metcalf

Appointed Secretary-General:

Julie Steele, Ph.D. (Australia)


Presentation of ISBS

The International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS) is composed of approximately 300 members from over 51 different countries with a common desire to study and understand human movement, especially as it relates to applied sport biomechanics. The first full scale conference of the ISBS was held June 20-25, 1982, in San Diego, California, with 123 participants. ISBS initiated a constitution on May 7, 1983, with subsequent constitutional revisions over time to suit the changing needs of the society. The society’s main objectives are to expand the knowledge of sport biomechanics and to provide a forum for researchers, teachers, coaches, and practitioners. The annual symposia of the ISBS are conducted in a friendly atmosphere, which favors and encourages wide participation. Past conferences have been held in a variety of interesting locations including several European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal), a number of US states (California, Colorado, Iowa, Oregon, Massachusetts, Texas), the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia and Ontario, as well as Australia and Hong Kong. The ISBS sponsors the Sports Biomechanics journal, which is edited by Roger Bartlett and several other important resources such as the Coaches Information Services http://www.coachesinfo.com/ and the Teachers Information Services http://www.usfca.edu/ess/tis/. For more information about the ISBS please visit our web site http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/External/isbs/

Eadric Bressel, PhD



Interview with the student representative

Congratulations to Cheryl Metcalf on her election as student representative in the ISB-council!!

Cheryl has made history, since she is the first officially elected student. Cheryl will take over from Motoshi Kaya, who was appointed to promote students involvement in ISB council work. In the following interview, we would like to focus on our new student representative. Hopefully, this will inspire other student ISB members to contact their representative if they want certain issues to be brought forward to the council or have other suggestions that can promote students involvement in ISB. Read below Cheryls presentation of herself and her answers to the editors questions.

“I would like to say how pleased and honoured I am to have been elected as the student representative on the council for the ISB. I’m looking forward to creating a more accessible interface between the Society and student members.

What is your own research?

My research focus is upper limb biomechanics, with particular emphasis on hand and wrist kinematics during functional tasks. I am based at the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom under the supervision of Dr Jane Burridge, Dr Paul Chappell and Dr Vikkie Yule.

What was your first contact with the ISB and who introduced you to the ISB?

I was introduced to the ISB by my supervisor Dr Vikkie Yule, who found it to be a helpful resource in her own research in Gait Analysis. I joined the society after looking at the ISB website and signing up for the BIOMECH-L email list, which has proved particularly useful.

What or who encouraged you to accept or be nominated for election?

I thought a lot about standing for the election. I talked to a couple people about my interest, and it was my family who helped me make my final decision. The encouragement from my friends and colleagues since the election results were released has been great, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for their support, particularly my family.

How do you think that students can benefit from membership to the ISB?

I think the greatest asset of the ISB is its existing members and the knowledge and experience they can provide for the students. You only have to look at the speakers and tutorials at the upcoming congress to see that the ISB can provide first-hand access to quality research. For those students who are unable, for whatever reason to attend the many conferences and meetings affiliated with the Society, I’m hoping to develop a framework to allow easier access to the existing knowledgebase and experience of the members.

Do you have suggestions for ISB initiatives that could improve student involvement in the ISB?

I have a few ideas to encourage student participation in the ISB and to provide a forum for communication of ideas and current research. I mentioned in my nomination statement the idea of developing an online database for members to contribute some basic contact information and details about their research interests. This would hopefully assist in allowing members to access centres of related research, and for established researchers to identify students for potential recruitment.

My next idea is rather a grand plan, and one that will definitely need the support of the ISB if it is to exceed. Over the next two years I would like to set up a student symposium to encourage first-time speakers to present their work in a supportive environment. I think initially it would be more appropriate to organise these events on a national basis and this would obviously require volunteers from the student body of the ISB. I hope that this would encourage participation from student members in the society and to promote the society to non-members, or other national-based societies.

In addition, two ideas that could be implemented immediately would be firstly to allocate a student section in the Newsletter and invite student members to contribute a biography of their research, their interests and their department. This would promote the student’s work and develop publicity for the specialism of their department/centre or school. Secondly, with the backing of the ISB we could send out one poster to every ISB member. This would promote the ISB and encourage new members to join.

I’m very excited about attending the ISB-Cleveland congress and I’m particularly looking forward to attending the baseball game… (and the lectures of course!). I hope to see a lot of you there and please come and find me if you have anything you want to bring to the attention of the ISB council, have an idea to promote the society to encourage student participation, or would like to discuss any of the ideas that have been put forward. See you there!”

This is the first time ISB has an officially elected student representative in the council. Such a commitment involves participation in council meetings in connection to conferences. The ISB council has therefore made the following decision to financially support the student representative.

1) Financial assistance will be provided to both the outgoing and incoming representative up to the amount of $500 (USD) each.

2) Financial assistance will be provided to representative up to the amount of $500 (USD) for the council meeting in the non-congress year.

Karen Søgaard




Notes from the archives

Eadweard Muybridge is considered one of the forefathers of both the movie industry and biomechanics. Our society’s most prestigious award is named after Eadweard Muybridge, the Muybridge Award. This award is made at our congresses, but who is Eadweard Muybridge? Muybridge had a colorful life with many highlights; some of which are listed in the following timeline.

Image
Eadweard Muybridge (1830-1904)
1830 - Edward James Muggeridge was born in Kingston-on-Thames in England . He subsequently changed his name twice, first to Eadweard Muygridge and then to Eadweard Muybridge.

1852 – left England for the USA , settled in San Francisco working as a book seller.

1860 – took out a patent for a photographic plate printing.

1867 – took landscape photos of Yosemite Valley , which lead to some fame as a photo-grapher.

1872 – took photo-sequence of Leland Stanford’s horse, Occident, trotting with all four hoofs simultaneously off of the ground. This apparently led to Stanford winning a $25,000 bet. Multiple cameras placed in a row were used to capture the horse’s motion.

1874 – shot and killed George Larkyns.

1875 – found innocent of murder, probably on grounds of temporary insanity.

1878 – drawings of his photographs of a horse walking and trotting appeared on the cover of The Scientific American.

1881 – Muybridge’s book The Attitudes of Animals in Motion was published.

1884 – began work at the University of Pennsylvania . Using an electronically triggered 24 camera system he endeavored to catalog animal movement.

1890 – Muybridge’s books Animal Locomotion: The Muybridge Work, and The Science of Animal Locomotion were published.

1904 – died in Kingston-on-Thames .

Muybridge contribution from a biomechanical perspective was in the area of motion analysis. He did not take measurements, but was one of the first to capture motion and did so for many species and movements. Although re-examination of his work has shown that he edited sets of photo-sequences together to produce a final sequence; this should not diminish our appreciation of the impact of his work as it promoted considerable thought about the nature of movement.

Image
Muybridge images of a horse trotting.
The recipients of the Muybridge Award to date are listed below.

Year Recipient

2003 Tetsuo Fukunaga ( Japan )

2001 David Winter ( Canada )

1999 Paavo Komi ( Finland )

1997 John P. Paul ( United Kingdom )

1995 Savio L-Y. Woo ( USA )

1993 Malcolm H. Pope ( USA )

1991 Robert McNeill Alexander (United Kingdom)

1989 Gunnar Andersson (USA/Sweden)

1987 Peter R. Cavanagh (USA)

(The ISB has an archive of its important materials, kept at Penn. State University . If you have any materials you think should be in the archive, and you would consider donating them to the archive please contact John Challis (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).)


Editors notes

In addition to reading this Newsletter you may want to keep an eye on the homepage to know what your ISB council is working with:

The full agenda for the Council meeting that will take place in Cleveland the 30 and 31 of July.will be published on the homepage in due time before the meeting.

Next Newsletter will bring you the summary from the Council meeting Further, we will present a short description of the new officers in the council. If you attend the ISB Conference we would welcome contributions with your opinion of the Conference and Cleveland in general.

Please, send your contribution in electronic form in any form of English to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

General deadline for the next Newsletter is the first of September !!

Summer greetings from the editor
Karen Søgaard

Image

 


 

ImageLatest News ISB/ASB Conference Cleveland 2005

  • See updated program on the web page: http://www.isb2005.org/program/
  • 1005 presentations have been scheduled
  • 825 people have pre-registered for the congress. We expect over 1000 participants.
  • University housing is nearly sold out. All 100 single rooms have been booked. You may still be lucky enough to find spaces in double rooms.
  • All the following countries are represented with abstracts:

USA

479

India

3

Canada

98

Singapore

3

Taiwan

74

Ireland

2

Japan

69

Spain

2

United Kingdom

59

Turkey

2

Netherlands

31

Bulgaria

1

Germany

26

Czech Republic

1

Brazil

23

Finland

1

Australia

21

Greece

1

Denmark

14

Iran

1

Korea

14

Norway

1

Belgium

13

Portugal

1

France

12

Russia

1

Hong Kong

9

Serbia

1

New Zealand

7

Slovenia

1

Switzerland

6

South Africa

1

China

5

Thailand

1

Italy

5

Venezuela

1

Sweden

5

Ton van der Bogert

 

 

 

Leaving abstracts submissions until the last minute!

We looked at the first 1,150 abstracts that were submitted to ISB2005 to determine when scientists submit abstracts to an international meeting. After separating abstracts according to time of submission and continent, it can be concluded that Australia is the continent that has the earliest average submission date. North America has the latest average date submission, but these researchers submitted the highest number of abstracts (i.e., 654). Note that (i) the vertical scales in the graphs below are different, and (ii) the vertical line indicates the average submission date whereas the dashed lines represent days close to the deadline.

North America

Image

South America

Image

Europe

Image

Africa

Image

Asia

Image

Australia

Image

Anthony Brown and Brian L. Davis


 


 

ImageANNOUNCEMENT

THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND TREATMENT (I.C.O.R.E.T.)

The I.C.O.R.E.T. is pleased to announce a special award for young researchers of orthopaedics, biomechanics/biology, operative techniques, and sports – the Y-ROBOTS Award. Manuscripts in the areas of orthopaedic biomechanics, orthopaedic biology, operative techniques in orthopaedics or sports medicine are being accepted for consideration of this outstanding research award. The first author must be less than 40 years or within no more than 8 years after his/her last academic degree (Ph.D. or M.D.) at the time of submission.

All applications will be reviewed and up to 10 finalists will be selected and invited for presentation at the 9th International Conference on Orthopaedics, Biomechanics, Sports Rehabilitation in Assisi/Perugia, Italy , between 11-13 November 2005. The winner of the Y-ROBOTS Award will be selected following the presentations by the finalists. The Members of the Award Committee are:

Chair: Savio L-Y. Woo, Ph.D.

Members: Giuliano Cerulli, M.D., Mario LaMontagne, Ph.D., Ejnar Eriksson, M.D., Ph.D., Ronny Lorentzon, M.D.

The award consists of:

  • 5.000,00 Euro
  • Award Certificate
  • Consideration for Publication in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy after the peer review process

The deadline for receipt of manuscripts will be October 1, 2005 . Six (6) copies of the completed application and manuscript should be submitted to:

Savio L-Y. Woo, Ph.D.
c/o Let People Move
Via G.G. Pontani, 9
06128 Perugia – Italy
Phone: 011-39-075-500-3956
Fax: 011-39-075-501-0921
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Website: www.letpeoplemove.com

Note :

  • Submissions, including papers, photographs, illustrations, etc. submitted will not be returned unless a self-address stamped envelope is included.. Members of the research groups of the Award Committee are not eligible.


Image

 


 

ISB Travel Grant

I would like to thank the International Society of Biomechanics Council for awarding me with an ISB Travel Grant. This 2000$ grant enabled me to realize one of my doctoral researches focussed on locomotion efficiency and precisely on the mechanical factors affecting the efficiency of human running. In fact, Prof. Rodger Kram has invited me be a full time graduate research student in the Locomotion Laboratory of the Integrative Physiology Department at the University of Colorado . This l aboratory has developed original methods and concepts that make it an ideal location for me to further explore the mechanical factors influencing the energy cost of running. Then, I was in Boulder during a first period of three months (September 8 – December 8, 2004 ).

The purpose of my visit at the Locomotion Laboratory was to plan and perform a new experiment that combine methods used in the University of Saint Etienne and the University of Colorado : simulated downhill and uphill running w as applied in simulated reduced gravity. In fact, I conducted research that involved normal running and running with aiding or impeding horizontal forces in normal and simulated reduced gravity. We used treadmill dynamometer to measure ground reaction forces and expired gas analysis to measure metabolic energy consumption. The aim of this study was to estimate the elastic energy stored during negative work phase and released during positive work phase of running in different conditions of gravity and speed running.

Moreover, I finished to write my first manuscript concerning the data of the experiment previously performed in Saint Etienne (entitled “New method of calculating the storage and release of elastic energy in running”) with the help of my two co-supervisors, Prof. Alain Belli from the University of Saint Etienne and Prof. Rodger Kram of the University of Colorado (CU).

ImageDuring all my stay, I attended weekly department colloquium and journal clubs, observed and audited biomechanics classes. I also improved my knowledge in Matlab and Endnote programs. This american experience was very instructive and enriching because I was in total immersion and my abilities to both speak and write english improved.

At last, I would like to tell you that besides my wonderful professional experience, my life was very exciting because I lived in an international student center with around thirty other students who helped make a new place like Boulder feel like home. Moreover, I practiced a lot of physical activities such biking, hiking, rock climbing, basketball, swimming, weight lifting and I played rugby in the CU rugbywomen team: it was awesome and fascinating!

I am impatient to go back to Boulder next summer for 3 other months in order to analyse, discuss and I hope to publish the data of the experiment perform at the Locomotion Laboratory. I hope I will be able to participate to the 20th or 21st ISB congress in order to present you the results of my experiment.

Christelle Chaux




ISB Travel Grant

I would like to thank the International Society of Biomechanics for awarding the travel grant. With this funding, I was able to visit the computational biomechanics group in Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli (IOR), Bologna, Italy, and join the Multimod Project developing team. This grant helped cover the costs of traveling, accommodation, subsistence and computer facilities for software development. I feel that I benefited significantly by working with both the engineers and programmers in this group during this one month visit. This enabled me to use their well equipped research facilities, experience the application of computer graphics and image processing techniques in computer simulation of biomechanics, and obtain valuable expertise for my further research at APU.

The aim of my study is to design and analyze an algorithm for the registration of CT and MR images, which will contributes to Finite Element (FE) modeling. FE method is widely used to simulate the mechanics of human joints. Human joints are a kind of complex organization, where both hard and soft tissues coexist adjacently. In the CT and MRI images of human joints, both hard tissue and soft tissue contain useful information that can contribute to the subsequent Finite Element Analysis (FEA). I attempt to develop a systematic theory-framework and a practical method to analyze musculo-skeletal structure of human joints through effective multi-modal medical image registration.

The primary goal of my visit was to join Multimod Project developing team and study the principles and skills of Multimod Application Framework (MAF), a software toolkit for the rapid development of computer-aided medicine applications. This study enabled me to integrate medical image registration algorithm in the MAF in future projects within APU as well as joint research ventures computational biomechanics research group in IOR.

Through the working with the MAF toolkit developers, I have increased understanding of the hierarchical data structure to integrate heterogeneous medical data and the multimod visualisation capabilities in MAF. I added an operation for registering two volume datasets, this program will can be used for the further algorithm development in the research. I also worked with biomechanics engineers in the group at IOR, to investigate the application requirement of medical image visualization and registration of heterogeneous biomedical data for biomechanics research. They are the first users of the DataManager, a software developed with MAF, which will be used to combine the data from different imaging modalities for musculo-skeletal simulation, as well as opening up new areas for bioengineering research.

Again I would like to thank the ISB for their financial support for this transnational access to the famous biomechanics lab in the world.

Yan Yang


ISB Dissertation Grant Report

To begin, I would like to offer my sincere gratitude to the International Society of Biomechanics and particularly the Awards Committee for awarding me with an ISB Student Dissertation Grant for 2004. This grant afforded the time and the tools necessary to develop the methods central to my dissertation. I intend to present my results at the XX th Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics in August 2005.

The focus of my doctoral dissertation, entitled “The Determination of Individual Muscle Action in Human Locomotion”, is the development of a time efficient and robust method of computing muscle forces in a musculoskeletal model of human gait. The goal is to use these muscle forces to understand how individual muscles contribute to the aspects of support, stabilization and forward progression during the different phases ofhuman walking. This research was motivated by the work of Anderson and Pandy (2001) where a large-scale optimization method was used to predict muscle function in a complex musculoskeletal model. The major drawback of their method was the difficulty in getting the optimization to converge and the months of supercomputing time necessary to calculate an accurate solution. In most clinical settings, prediction is less critical than knowing what is actually occurring. In fact, gait analysis already provides a significant amount of information that describes the patient’s movement. What is missing, however, is the knowledge of how the nervous system and muscles work to produce that motion.

A new computational method for computing individual muscle forces was developed that takes advantage of the available observations of body motion from position markers affixed to a subject’s body as well as ground reaction forces measured via force-plates. The problem was one of how to solve for the muscle forces in order to actuate a musculoskeletal model so that it follows these observations, which is essentially a tracking problem.

The tracking problem was partitioned into two parts: first a skeletal-motion control problem and then a neuromuscular control problem. Since the motion of a multi-body system, like the skeleton, is uniquely governed by applied joint torques (rotational forces), the observations of the motion and external reaction forces were used to formulate a tracking-control solution to determine the required joint torques. The well-known “method of computed torques” from robotics was extended to include the tracking of ground-reaction forces in order to provide more accurate and stable torques. In the second part, an optimal control system describing theneuromuscular “excitation-to-torque” dynamics was controlled to track the computed torques. The neuromuscular system was manipulated using nonlinear control theory to cast it into an optimal linear-quadratic tracking problem, which has an efficient method of solution. This novel approach provides the ability to track torques while simultaneously minimizing a performance criterion to resolve the muscle redundancy problem.

Muscle redundancy is a natural consequence of the human musculature, which has many muscles spanning a joint and therefore has a continuous set of muscle force combinations that can produce the same joint torque.

Thus, a form of optimal decision-making is necessary to uniquely and efficiently distribute muscle activity. An advantage of our approach is that it can minimize a criterion such as total muscle effort, which is evaluated over the entire performance period, opposed to simpler methods that minimize instantaneous muscle stress. This is an important feature that enables realistic performance criteria to be applied. These algorithms for skeletal-motion and neuromuscular tracking provide a new methodology for computing muscle force estimates in a few minutes rather than days or weeks without neglecting neuromuscular dynamics, sacrificing the accuracy of forward simulations, or being adversely affected by model complexity. This methodology was applied to a model of maximal-height jumping as a challenging benchmark problem, which revealed that tracking could generate accurate results comparable to large-scale parameter optimization but in a minute fraction of the time. I am currently preparing to submit the tracking methodology and these results for review and publication.

The necessity for vast amounts of computing time and resources has been a large obstacle facing the acceptance of musculoskeletal modeling as a clinical tool. Now that muscle forces from complex musculoskeletal models can be accurately computed in a matter of minutes, the door is opening for models to be included in the clinical diagnosis and treatment planning processes. As a result of this methodology, one can begin to understand the role of individual muscles during gait on a subject-by-subject basis and not have to resort to an “average subject” representation. Hopefully, this work will give rise to new clinical tools for identifying and quantifying patient specific deficiencies within a broader and more detailed understanding of “normal” gait.

Ajay Seth


ISB Dissertation Grant Report

First of all, I would like to thank the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) for having supported my research work with the Dissertation Matching award. It was a substantial and very helpful financial support for my work and I hope this will be the case for many future students as well.

My research work was focussed on total ankle implants of unconstrained type, namely the Buechel-Pappas prosthesis. This particular prosthesis was chosen as a representative for several mechanically almost identical designs that are available on the orthopaedic market these days (e.g. STAR, Hintegra, Salto etc.). Ankle prostheses of unconstrained type are designed as not to transmit shear stresses at the implant-to-bone interface at the level of the tibia. Thus they are less prone to loosening tendencies, which early prosthesis designs of constrained type did show. This design rationale of minimizing the shear stresses is attained in several modern designs by means of a meniscal PE bearing which is free to glide and rotate on a flat tibial metal component. This tibial component therefore transmits only compressive forces from the foot to the shank segment.

The main research objective of my work was to determine, weather subjects with a prostheses of unconstrained type alter the transmitted net moment at the level of the ankle joint as compared to normal healthy subjects, particularly in the transverse plane. In order to answer this question two groups of 10 individuals each were analyzed in our gait laboratory. The first group consisted of 10 normal adults, whereas the second group was formed by persons with a total ankle implant of unconstrained type (Buechel-Pappas). All persons with a total ankle implant showed a good clinical outcome. The used measurement equipment for these biomechanical measurements consisted of a 7 camera Vicon ™ 3.5 System and a Kistler™ force measuring platform (Type 9281B). Time resolved kinematic segment information was gained with a least squares cluster fit routine of a redundant marker set according to Gander and Hrebicek in the 3-dimensional laboratory space (translation plus rotation, in total 6 DoF per segment). A static calibration of the statically over-determined force measuring platform was performed to improve accuracy (Dettwyler 2003).

After correction for individual height and mass, the net forces and net moments as well as inverted time of ground contact as a measure of speed were compared. It was found that the subjects with ankle prosthesis showed a lowered walking speed by approximately 10% (p>0.99). As a consequence, the net forces in vertical direction showed less dynamics (p>0.99). The forces and moments in the transverse plane were, however, not altered significantly. This finding was not expected intuitively at the beginning of the project. However, it has to be stressed out that the group with an ankle arthroplasty included only subject of good or excellent clinical outcome.

The calculation of the individual muscle forces at the ankle is, in terms of mathematics, an over-determined system, the solution of which would have been only feasible with further assumptions. Selected EMG recordings showed no consistently different activation pattern between the two investigated groups. Mainly the peroneal and the posterior tibial muscles can potentially generate an external/internal rotation torque in the transverse plane at the level of the ankle.

ImageA simple model of the cylindrical joint contact between the trochlea of the talus and the inferior joint surface of the tibia showed, that this joint is able to transmit a rotational torque in the transverse plane when loaded.

During normal ambulation, compressive forces in the order of 4-5 times bodyweight are generated in the ankle.

The cylindrical joint surfaces are therefore highly loaded in the healthy ankle which leads to a considerable contribution to the rotational resistance in the transverse plane. This effect is not present in persons with an ankle arthroplasty of unconstrained type.

Passive structures such as ligaments have to compensate for this lack of rotational stiffness. It would therefore be interesting to investigate whether persons with an ankle arthroplasty of unconstrained type show an increased ligament strength and/or build-up after rehabilitation or in the course of time following the surgery.

Recent clinical results with total ankle implants of unconstrained type are encouraging and a growing interest in this particular field is present in professional circles.

Markus Dettwyler
(This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
ETH Hönggerberg, HCI E 451
8093 Zürich
Switzerland

References:

Buechel F. F., Pappas M. J. and Iorio L. J. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: Biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot & Ankle 8(6):279-290, 1988.

Dettwyler M., Stacoff A. and Stüssi E. Static in situ calibration of statically over-determined ground reaction force measuring platforms. In: XIXth International Congress of Biomechanics, p. 88, Dunedin 2003.

Gander W. and Hrebicek J. Solving Problems in Scientific Computing using Maple and MATLAB. 3rd edition. Springer, 1997.

 

 


 

ISB Travel Grant Report

Wednesday, 17th March 2004 , 6.00pm : I was playing football in the sports hall with the staff of Exercise and Sport Science Dept when my colleague Luca Ardigò entered the room wearing an unrecognisably large smile. Wondering the reason for the unusual expression, I asked him about it and he replied, almost moved to tears: “We’ve just been awarded the ISB Travel Grant!” Having at that time fairly ropey financial situation, the news was absolutely great: with the ISB grant I would be able to carry on with my project on the development of cross-country skiing (from 3000BC to date) and the biomechanical and physiological implications of locomotion on snow.

The ISB Travel Grant alone supported half the expenses related to my project: from flight tickets to car and ski tunnel rental. My initial impression was of a pleasant trip to Finland , which in May, as in the rest of Northern Scandinavia , is still covered in snow. Little did we know that our fate was about to reveal itself as something quite different! The flight was spent praying for the safe arrival of the skis: perfect replicas of ancient models found in Scandinavian bogs, painstakingly made by Mr Tony Whitehead and his collaborators at the Design and Technology Dept at MMU, and now being carried on a plane (hopefully the right one) after the potentially perilous loading. Fortunately, however our arrival at the Vuokatti ski tunnel was smooth: Mr Pekka Vahasoyrinki and his collaborators welcomed us as warmly as they could (temperature was -12°C) and the gas cylinder, needed to calibrate the oxygen consumption system, had arrived at the tunnel. Everything seemed fine, but we quickly became aware of what working in the ski tunnel actually meant. We spent 10 days working an average of 11 hours in the absolutely ‘standard environmental conditions’ we had looked for: -5.2°C (± 1.1°C, n=115) and 84% humidity! Despite being a somewhat chilly experience, the instruments worked well, the data collection was good and gave us interesting results to be published in the very near future (we shall see it in one of the next ‘Literature updates’ by Young-Hui Chang). This opportunity was immensely helpful for me, as it provided the chance to practise proper biomechanical fieldwork as well as learning how to perform experiments outside the laboratory, with technology only ever used at the University. We collected data about oxygen consumption, heart rate and motion (by means of inertial sensors) of participants skiing the length of the tunnel (1250m) back and forth at two different speeds, with a total of 7 pairs of skis belonging to different historical periods, from 3000BC to the modern times. The cost of skiing was calculated as well as the work against friction and the internal work. The external work was estimated by subtracting from the measured cost of skiing the metabolic equivalent of internal work and work against friction. Kinematic variables such as speed at different gradients and stride length were measured and calculated.

On the last day of our stay we finally had a really lovely evening and our sufferings were rewarded: our frozen limbs (upper and lower) were warmed in a typical Finnish sauna and our souls reanimated by beer and meat, all in front of a fire, looking at a still-frozen lake just outside the window.

Thank you to ISB, my Professor Alberto Minetti and Mr Luca Ardigò for their much appreciated help.

Federico Formenti
Manchester Metropolitan University , UK


 

ISB Travel Grant Report

I would like to thank the ISB council for awarding me a 2003 ISB Congress Travel Grant. The award made it possible for me to travel half way around the world from Ann Arbor , Michigan USA to my first ever scientific meeting in Dunedin , New Zealand . I couldn’t have dreamed up a better first experience.

ImageOne of the most exciting aspects of doing research is collaboration. Science cannot move forward unless minds merge, feedback swirls, and innovation is unleashed; I experienced some of all of these elements when we convened in Dunedin . I found the interactions I had with other students, professors, and researchers at the XIXth Congress extremely exciting and stimulating. The scope, variety and quality of the research presented was astounding.

I thoroughly enjoyed attending many of the talks and posters in the program. I particularly enjoyed the keynote lecture given by Alberto Minetti because of its relevance to my own area of research. It was great to finally put faces with many of the names I have only seen in journal publications: Maarten Bobbert, Steven Vogel, Thomas Brown, Chris Kirtley, and Roger Enoka to name a few.

The meeting solidified my view that it is extremely important to do work in areas where standard disciplines overlap (i.e. Neuromechanics). It is equally important to learn to speak to other scientists coming from different backgrounds. Clear communication can lead to great progress. I had the unique opportunity at the XIXth Congress to present my work supported by the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation on powered lower limb orthoses to an attentive and enthusiastic audience. Our work on powered orthoses is new and largely untested. My presentation was well attended and generated considerable interest from the ISB community. This positive experience gave me continued motivation and confidence that my work is important. In addition my colleague and good friend, Keith Gordon, was presented with the Young Investigator Award for best poster presentation on his work using our powered orthoses to study adaptation in human locomotion. I was extremely excited for Keith and his award also signaled the importance of our work.

Finally, I would like to thank the organizing committee and the University of Otago for the accommodations, hospitality, and a well designed program that included many fun events (Sea Kayaking, Bicycling, the Pub Crawl, Lunches and Teas) in addition to lots of good science. I look forward to attending future meetings of the ISB. See you next time!!!!

Greg Sawicki
Human Neuromechanics Lab
University of Michigan , USA



ISB Travel Grant Report

Biomechanics and energetics of pentapedal locomotion in Red Kangaroos

Kangaroos (Macropoidea) move in a biomechanically interesting way at slow speeds; they walk pentapedally using their tail to "crutch" along. Early work by Dawson and Taylor (1973) on two Red Kangaroos (Macropus rufus) suggested that this mode of locomotion is metabolically expensive. Despite the apparent expense, kangaroos largely rely on their pentapedal gait to forage and graze. I proposed to study the biomechanics and energetics of pentapedal walking in kangaroos for two main reasons. First, understanding the biomechanical determinants of the metabolic cost of pentapedal walking provides insight into the behavior, ecology and evolution of a relatively large group of animals (there are 45 recognized species of kangaroos). Second, applying theory developed during our previous work on bipedal walking to a unique form of locomotion is a strict test of the generality of its principles.

To study pentapedal walking, I traveled to the University of New South Wales to work with Prof. Terry Dawson in the Department of Biological Sciences. With the help of my colleagues, I studied the metabolic energetics of pentapedal walking in seven Red Kangaroos. We trained the animals to wear a mask and walk on a treadmill at a range of speeds. This allowed us to measure metabolic power using open-flow indirect calorimetry. To study biomechanics of pentapedal walking, we trained the same animals to walk along a walkway and across a force platform. A video camera recorded sagittal plane motion. By combining video and ground reaction force data, the mechanical work required to walk pentapedally could be calculated. In addition, this methodology allows us to determine the relative contributions of the fore limbs, hind limbs and, in particular, the tail to the dynamics of pentapedal walking.

We found that pentapedal walking is mechanically expensive. When compared to human bipedal walking at the same speed, pentapedal walking requires, on average, 5.5 times the mechanical power when normalized for body mass. Correspondingly, and in support of the earlier work of Dawson and Taylor, we found that pentapedal walking is metabolically expensive. When compared to human bipedal walking at the same speeds, pentapedal walking requires, on average, 2.6 times the gross metabolic power when normalized for body mass. The efficiency of performing mechanical work was 0.20, close to that predicted from isolated muscle experiments (0.21), suggesting that the metabolic expense of pentapedal locomotion is a result of a large mechanical work requirement. We also found that the front legs, hind legs and tail have different functions. The hind legs support the majority of the body weight and perform the majority of the work. The front legs act mainly as a brake and the tail acts mainly as a motor. Surprisingly, the tail generates the same amount of mechanical power as both human legs in bipedal walking. Using mathematical models, we are currently studying whether the asymmetry in the length of the legs may be responsible for the elevated mechanical work requirements of pentapedal walking.

I performed this research in collaboration with Terry Dawson, Rodger Kram, Suzette Rodoreda, and Alena Grabowski. We would like to thank Andrew McIntosh, Adam Munn and Koa Webster for their help and the International Society of Biomechanics for helping fund this research.

J. Maxwell Donelan



ISB Dissertation Grant Report 2004

I would like to thank the International Society of Biomechanics for awarding me the ISB Matching Dissertation Grant for 2004. The grant contributed to my data collection and to my ability to attend International Society of Biomechanics’ XXth Congress in Cleveland in August 2005.

Purpose and Background

Precision work is associated with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities, particularly the shoulders (4, 7) that develop as a response to long duration fatigue from light repetitive work (11). Musculoskeletal stress increased with increased precision in tasks (5, 7, 9) that were so short that fatigue was not likely to develop. However, fatigue would be progressive in (2) and accompanied by changes in performance, discomfort, and physiological indices. My dissertation work expands on my earlier repetitive precision work (8, 9, 10) to determine how movement patterns, muscle activation patterns, and performance changes throughout precision tasks that last seven minutes, and how performance on a standardized task is altered after those seven minutes.

Repetitive tapping, with a hand-held probe, between a Home and a precision target was studied earlier. Precision was at three levels and movements in the sagittal or scapular plane were elicited while joint trajectories and elctromyographic data were recorded. Changes in both precision and layout elicited changes in joint kinematics (8,9,10) and the EMGs of shoulder muscles (9). Dividing the Home to target movement into two components: a rapid distance covering component (Phase I) and a slower homing in component (Phase II) showed that joint dynamics and the EMG of two shoulder muscles were very different during these two phases. Joint velocities were statistically different (P < 0.05) for different levels of precision during Phase II (9). There were monotonic increases in the EMG of the descending trapezius with increased precision, in both phases with such differences reaching statistical significance (P < 0.05) during Phase II (9). Movements in the two different planes produced statistically different joint postures and velocities (P < 0.05) and movements in the sagittal plane produced higher EMGs in the descending trapezius (16).

Experimental

In the experiments performed in 2004, layout was set at 2 levels described above. Targets of 19 mm, 10 mm, and 3.2 mm diameter created low, medium, and high precision conditions. A 48 mm diameter target (no precision) was added since work in this condition elicited only a ballistic movement (Phase I). Any fatigue or performance changes in this condition could be attributed to rapid repetitive work, and not precision. Nine participants worked in the sagittal plane only, eleven worked in the scapular planes, and nine worked in both the scapular and sagittal planes.

During Main Tasks participants repetitively tapped between the Home and a single precision target for seven minutes while joint trajectories, and the electromyograms of six muscles were monitored. Each Main Task was part of a Task Unit, which included an Early Discomfort Survey (3) and Early Composite Task, the Main Task, and a Late Composite Task, a Late Discomfort Survey, and a fatigue survey. A measure of motivation was incorporated on the fatigue survey (1). Breaks were provided after each of the Task Units.

Composite Tasks lasted 45 seconds and elicited movements of multiple amplitudes at three levels of precision and in the same movement plane as the Main Task. Participants moved between the Home and a ray of targets that were tapped in a pre-defined order.

Results and Discussion

People reported significantly greater discomfort after repetitive work than before (P < 0.001) and significantly more errors (P = 0.043) were made during Composite Tasks after that work. There were small and monotonic, although statistically insignificant [1] increases in Early and Late Discomfort Ratings with increasing Task Unit Number.

Discomfort increased monotonically with increased precision for the high, medium, and low precision conditions and it was significantly greater after high precision than after low precision work. There was also a statistically significant interaction between precision and Task Unit Number (P = 0.029). For the high precision condition, Late Discomfort ratings increased greatly with Task Unit Number, whereas ratings for other levels of precision did not increase or increased much less with Task Unit Number. Precision also statistically impacted motivation (P < 0.001) and there was a statistically significant interaction between precision and Task Unit Number on motivation (P < 0.001). People were less motivated after performing high than medium or low precision work. The decline in motivation was exacerbated with Task Unit Number for the high precision tasks, whereas it did not decline much, or may have even increased with time for tasks at other levels of precision. Performance during the Late Composite Tasks was not impacted by precision (P = 0.712).

In summary, results show that discomfort develops during seven minutes of repetitive tapping and performance does decline after work. High precision tasks had a greater impact than low precision tasks on discomfort and motivation. The strong effect of precision on discomfort and on motivation, and the significant interaction between precision and Task Unit Number on both discomfort and motivation shows that tasks of different levels of precision are somehow different. The effects of residual discomfort are exacerbated when high precision work is performed, whereas it may not be when medium or low precision work is performed.

Conclusions about the kinematics and muscle activation patterns from the 2004 study are not yet available. However, characterizing joint movement patterns and muscle activation patterns throughout Main Tasks and of joint movements from the Composite Tasks will shed more light on how work during both Phase I and Phase II elicits changes in movements and other metrics of fatigue.

Kathleen Shyhalla
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
University of Buffalo
The State University of New York , USA

[1] Discomfort data is reported for the sagittal plane movements.

References

1. Ahsberg E. (2000). Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 41, 231-241.

2. Bystrom, S., and Fransson-Hall, C. (1994). Acceptability of intermittent handgrip contractions based on physiological response. Human Factors, 36, 158-171.

3. Corlett, E., and Bishop, R.P. (1976). A techniques for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19, 175-182.

4. Ekberg, K., Karlsson, M., and Axelson, O. (1995). Cross-sectional study of risk factors for symptoms in the neck and shoulder area. Ergonomics, 38, 971-980.

5. Laursen, B., Jensen, B.R., and Sjogaard, G. (1998). Effect of speed and precision demands on human shoulder muscle electromyography during a repetitive task. European Journal of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology. 78, 544-548

6. Milerad, E., and Ekenvall, L. (1990). Symptoms of the neck and upper extremities in dentists. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health, 16. 129-134.

7. Milerad, E., Ericson, M.O., Nisell, R., and Kilbom, A. (1991). An electromyographic study of dental work. Ergonomics, 34, 953-962.

8. Shyhalla, K. (2003). Wrist and forearm movements while homing in on precision Targets. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Denver, Colorado, September 13-September 17, 2003. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica , California .

9. Shyhalla, K. (2002). Effects of layout and precision on shoulder musculoskeletal stress during repetitive tapping tasks. Unpublished Master’s thesis. University at Buffalo : Buffalo , NY .

10. Shyhalla, K., Paquet, V. and, Drury, C. (2002). Wrist and forearm postures during movements to targets during repetitive precision tasks. Bridging Fundamentals and New Opportunities. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Baltimore , Maryland . Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica , California .

11. Westerblad, H., Bruton, J. D., Allen, D. G., and Lannergren, J. (2000). Functional significance of Ca2+ in long-lasting fatigue of skeletal muscle. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 83, 166-174.



ISB Dissertation Grant Report 2003

In June 2003, I was awarded $2000 by the ISB to assist my research in the stability of acetabular components in cemented hip replacements. I would like to thank the society for this Student Dissertation Award which was of valuable help in the running of my research program.

The money obtained was used to purchase a computer with high specifications which allowed me to carry out my finite element (FE) analysis involving contact elements faster. The computer was also used to capture confidential CT-Scan data from the collaborating hospitals as this process required a stand-alone computer. This enabled me to satisfy the internal regulations related to data protection act and patient confidentiality. This funding was matched by Anglia Polytechnic University for the purchase of 10 synthetic hemi pelvic bones. These will be used for the in-vitro testing of cemented reconstructed hemi pelves to validate my FE models.

It has been recognised that the rate of loosening of hip implants increases exponentially 10 years post operatively. With the ageing population who are most prone to hip disorders, the aim of my research is to improve the long-term stability of acetabular components in cemented hip replacements. Ct-Scan data of hospital patients with different sizes of acetabula is downloaded into Materialise software which acts as an interface between Ct-Scan data and any FE package. The contours generated are then exported into I-Deas 11.0, FE analysis package, where 3-D anatomically correct of reconstructed hemi pelves are created through a lofting process. Using the FEA package, we are then able to investigate the stress distribution in the cement mantle for hemi pelvic models with different sizes of acetabula and different bone quality.

In-vitro tests are carried out on composite synthetic bones obtained from Sawbones Company, to validate the finite element models. These synthetic bones possess material properties comparable to human bone. A bi-axial hydraulic mechanical testing machine (Instron 8874) is used for the dynamic testing of the reconstructed hemi pelves. We will make use of a hip simulator that will be able to mimic the gait cycle of a patient having undergone a hip replacement.

Jean-Marie Steeve Lamvohee
Bioengineering Research Group
Anglia Polytechnic University , UK





5th World Congress of Biomechanics

ImageImageMunich , Germany - July 29th-August 4th 2006

Incorporating

  • The 31st Congress of the Societé de Biomécanique
  • The 15th European Society of Biomechanics

First Call for Papers

The Scientific Organizing Committee of the 5th World Congress of Biomechanics is seeking original research and application papers in the following areas:

Musculoskeletal mechanics

  • Cartilage
  • Disc
  • Muscle mechanics
  • Tendons and ligaments
  • Tissue adaptation and remodeling

Artificial organs

  • Artificial kidney and dialysis
  • Artificial heart devices
  • Artificial circulatory assist devices
  • Artificial liver
  • Artificial lungs and pulmonary assistance

Cellular and molecular mechanics

  • Cell mechanics
  • Cytoskeletal and membrane rheology
  • Cell migration and molecular motor
  • Mechanotransduction
  • Molecular biomechanics
  • DNA and protein mechanics
  • Microstructural modeling of cells

Occupational and impact biomechanics

  • Impact injury biomechanics
  • Vehicular biomechanics-safety, impact vehicular guidance
  • Ergonomics
  • Spine kinematics
  • Low back pain
  • Occupational disorders, repetitive strain injury
  • Rehabilitation mechanics

Bone mechanics

  • Bone healing
  • Bone as an organ
  • Bone remodeling
  • Bone tissue
  • Osteointegration
  • Osteoporosis

Implants for trauma and orthopedics

  • Hip endoprosthetics
  • Knee endoprosthetics
  • Wear
  • Shoulder endoprosthetics
  • Trauma implants
  • Implantable telemetry

Respiratory mechanics

  • Airway liquid dynamics
  • Parenchymal and whole lund mechanics
  • Flow through compliant airways
  • Pulmonary cell mechanics
  • Whole lung function measurement and control

Microcirculation and biorheology

  • Cell-vascular wall interactions and cell adhesion
  • Blood rheology
  • Angiogenesis
  • Glycocalix
  • Microvascular fluid mechanics

Biomechanics in nature

  • Bionics
  • Swimming and flying
  • Micro organisms
  • Plant biomechanic
  • Terrestrial locomotion

Brain and neural mechanics

  • Cerebral aneurysmus
  • Panta Rei
  • Imaging
  • Cerebro-spinal fluid

Musculoskeletal systems and performance

  • Gait analysis
  • Joints
  • Hip
  • Knee
  • Upper extremity
  • Locomotion and falls – mechanisms, injuries and interventions
  • Neuromuscular control
  • Spine mechanics

Dental mechanics

  • Bone implant interaction phenomena
  • Bone and periodontal ligament
  • Dental implant mechanics
  • Dental materials reliability
  • Image processing and computer-aided presurgical analysis
  • Mechanics and mechanobiology in orthodontics
  • Dental device manufacturing and biomechanical reliability
  • Numerical modeling in dental biomechanics
  • Experimental testing in dental biomechanics

Cardiovascular mechanics

  • Cardiac mechanics and biology
  • Cardiovascular function and control
  • Tissue adaptation and remodeling
  • Coronary circulation
  • Arterial or large vessel fluid mechanics
  • Heart valves and prostheses
  • Vascular wall elasticity
  • Mechanobiology of vascular walls and cells
  • Vascular implants and devices
  • Computational modeling
  • Flow measument and imaging
  • Cardiovascular disease

Computer-assisted surgery

  • Navigation in orthopaedic surgery
  • Navigation in neurosurgery
  • Robotic systems
  • Vascular surgery
  • Surgical technologies
  • Large vessel tissue and cardiac valve engineering and vascular elasticity
  • Platform technologies in tissue engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Characterization of biomaterials
  • Endovascular materials

General biomechanics

  • Bioheat transfer
  • Biological mass transport
  • Clean room technology
  • Flow-structure interactions
  • Geriatric mechanics
  • Micro-fluidic devices
  • Paediatric mechanics

Biomechanics of miscellaneous organs

  • Soft tissues
  • Reproductive systems
  • Eyes
  • Ears
  • Skin
  • Urinary tract

Sport biomechanics

Computational Biomechanics

The conference language will be English. Submissions to the Congress will be electronic and should consist of an extended two page abstract.

At least one author of each accepted paper must register for and present the work at the Congress.

For more information please consult the Congress website at www.wcb2006.org

Important Dates

  • Abstract Submission Deadline January 30th, 2006
  • Notification of Acceptance March 15th 2006
  • Early registration Deadline May 1st 2006
  • Congress Dates July 29th- August 4, 2006

ImageImageImage

 


 

Upcoming meetings, workshops

2005

ImageThe 9th World Multi- Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics

Dates: July 10-13, 2005
Venue: Orlando, Florida, USA
Info:  Website:
www.iiisci.org/sci2005 

ImageISB XX International Society of Biomechanics Congress

Dates: August 1-5, 2005
Venue: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Info:  Email
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Website: http://www.ISB2005.org 

ImageISSP 11th World Congress of Sport Psychology

Dates: August 15 – 19, 2005
Venue: Sydney , Australia
Info:  Website
www.issp2005.com 

Image3rd International Conference on  "Biomechanics of the lower limb in health, disease and rehabilitation"

Dates: September 5-7th 2005
Venue: Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research,
       University of Salford, England
Info:  Website
http://www.healthcare.salford.ac.uk/crhpr/ 
       Email
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

ImageEuropean Society for Biomaterials combined ses-sion with European Society of Biomechanics at the 19th European Conference on Biomaterials

Dates: 11-15 September, 2005
Venue: Sorrento, Italy
Info:

Professor Elizabeth Tanner, Department of Materials
Queen Mary University of London
Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK
Dr Damien Lacroix, CREB
University Polytechnica de Catalunya
Ave Diagonal, Barcelona, Spain

APCST 2005 Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology

Dates: September 12-14, 2005
Venue: Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Info:  Email
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
       Website
www.astaonline.com.au 

ImageII International Conference on Computational Bioengineering

Dates: 14-16 September, 2005
Venue: Lisboa, Portugal
Info:  Website www.dem.ist.utl.pt/~iccb2005/

Image11th International ACAPS Conference

Dates: 26-28 October, 2005
Venue: Paris, France
Info:  Website www.acaps-paris.org

ImageISPO 2005 Annual Scientific Meeting of the International So-ciety for Prosthetics and Orthotics, Australian National Member Society

Dates: 2-5 November, 2005
Venue: Sydney, Australia
Info:  Website
www.dcconferences.com.au/ispo2005/index.php

APB2005 The Second Asian-Pacific Conference on Biome-chanics

Dates: 23-25 November, 2005
Venue: Taipei, Taiwan
Info:  Email Jaw-Lin Wang,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ImageFirst International Conference on Mechanics of Biomaterials & Tissues

Dates: December 11-14, 2005
Venue: Waikoloa, Hawai’I, USA
Info:  Website
www.icmobt.elsevier.com 

 

2006

ImageNASPSPA 2006 Conference

Dates: June 1-3, 2006
Venue: Denver, Colorado.
Info:  For this conference, we will join with the American College of Sports Medicine.

24th Symposium of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS)

Dates: 14-18 July, 2006
Venue: Salzburg, Austria
Info:  E
mail Prof. Dr. Hermann Schwameder, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Image5th World Congress of Biomechanics

Dates: 29 July 4 August, 2006.
Venue: Munich, Germany
Info:  Email Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Dieter Liepsch,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
       Website
http://www.wcb2006.org 

ImageCanadian Society of Biomechanics Meeting

Dates: August 16-19th, 2006
Venue: University of Waterloo,
       Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 
Info:  Email 
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
       Wedbsite
http://www.csb2006.uwaterloo.ca/

3rd International Ankle Symposium

Dates: 1-3 September, 2006
Venue: Dublin, Ireland
Info:  Email
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 


 

 

ISB Membership News

Listed on the following pages are the Society’s new members. Membership is growing rapidly, particularly in the student category.

Existing members who have not renewed their 2005 membership have all been sent a reminder notice by e-mail. If you are not sure of your status then login at www.isbmem.org and check for yourself. Our primary means of communicating with our members now is via e-mail, so please make sure that your e-mail address is kept current.

The ISB Executive Council will meet in Cleveland on the two days prior to Congress2005. Matters planned for discussion during those meetings will shortly be posted on our website: www.isbweb.org. If you would like to see additional matters discussed then by all means let the President or General-Secretary know.

New Members to ISB:

 

Mr. Brian Higginson
Exercise and Sport Science
Oregon State University
PMB 162 59 Memorial Union
Corvallis, OR 97331
United States of America

Mr. Adam Bartsch
7349 Worthington Galena Road
Columbus, Ohio 43228
United States of America

Dr. John Borstad
Physical Therapy
Ohio State University
Atwell Hall 453 West 10th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43221
United States of America

Mr. dan street
podiatry
Newbury & Community NHS PCT
apple cottage appleshaw
andover, hampshire sp11 9bh
United Kingdom

Mr. MANSOUR ESLAMI
KINESIOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL
4870 COTE DES NEIGES, APT E1202
MONTREAL, QC H3V 1H3
Canada

Dr. Geza Kogler
Orthopaedics
Springfield Clinic
1025 S. 7th, St. P.O. Box 19248
Springfield Clinic, IL 62794-9248
United States of America

Mrs. Sietske Aalbersberg
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
van der Boechorststraat 9
Amsterdam, 1081 BT
Netherlands

Ms. Anne Su
Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anatomical Sciences
Stony Brook University
SUNY- Stony Brook Dept. of Anthropology
Stony Brook, NY 11794
United States of America

Ms. Diane Gregory
Kinesiology
University of Waterloo
31 Erb Street East
Waterloo, Ontario N2J1L5
Canada

Ms. Elizabeth Kardos
1413 York Ave #8
New York, NY 10021
United States of America

Dr. Cheolwoong Ko
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory (OBL), Orthopaedic Surgery
Carver Collage of medicine, The University of Iowa
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory (OBL), 2180 Westlawn
Iowa city, Iowa 52242-1100
United States of America

Miss Cheng-Feng Lin
Center for Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 7135 Medical School Wing E, Division of Physical therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
United States of America

Dr. Arthur Croft
Spine Research Institute of San Diego
2731 Via Orange Way, Suite 105
Spring Valley, CA 91978
United States of America

Mr. Charles Cejka
Institute of Medical Science
University of Toronto
10 Burnley Place
Brampton, Ontario L6Z 2V1
Canada

Mr. Zachary Riley
Integrative Physiology
University of Colorado, Boulder
CLARE RM 114 Campus Box 0354
Boulder, CO 80309
United States of America

 

Mr. Alasdair Dempsey
Human Movement and Exercise Science
The University of Western Australia
School Of Human Movement & Exercise Science The University of Western Australia M408 35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, WA 6157
Australia

Ms. Raffaella De Vita
Mechanical Engineering
University of Pittsburgh
5660 Munhall Road Apt. 12 Pittsburgh, PA, 15217
Pittsburgh, PA 15217
United States of America

Mr. Sang Kyoon Park
Kinesiology
University of Calgary
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, 2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

Mr. Luc Selen
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johan van Soesdijkstraat 26-1
Diemen, 1111 BD
Netherlands

Ms. sujani agraharasamakulam
ADAM center
Long Island University
122 Ashland Place,apt # 1A
brooklyn, ny 11201
United States of America

Mr. Jesus Camara
Department of biomechanics
Basque Institute of Physical Education and Sport
C/Zumalacarregui 52 7ºA
Bilbao, Bizkaia 48006
Spain

Mr. Ian Kenny
School of Health Sciences
University of Ulster
15J20 University of Ulster Jordanstown
Newtownabbey, County Antrim BT37 0QB
United Kingdom

Mr. Blayne Hettinga
Kinesiology
University of Calgary
6328 Lynch Cres SW
Calgary, Alberta T3E 5T9
Canada

Mr. Brady Anderson
Kinesiology
Human Performance Lab, University of Calgary
709 R 1st Ave NW
Calgary, Alberta t2n0a2
Canada

Mr. Jay Worobets
Kinesiology
University of Calgary
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, Alberta T2N-1N4
Canada

Mr. Roy Gillespie
4873 Warbler Crt
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1W 5A1
Canada

Mrs. Suzanne Hoffman
Industrial & Operations Engineering
University of Michigan
820 North Mansfield
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
United States of America

Dr. Richard Baker
Hugh Williamson Gait Analysis Laboratory
Royal Children's Hospital
Flemington Road
Parkville, Victoria 3052
Australia

Mr. Daniel Gales
Kinesiology
Pennsylvania State University
39 Rec Hall Biomechanics Laboratory
University Park, PA 16802
United States of America

Mr. Alexander Willmott
Kinesiology
Indiana University
Biomechanics Lab (HPER 071), 1025 E 7th St
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States of America

Dr. Serdar ARITAN
Biomechanics Research Group, School of Sport Sciences&Technology
Hacettepe University
Hacettepe University Biomechanics Research Group School of Sport Sciences&Technology
Ankara, 6800
Turkey

Mr. Christopher Adam
iF
The Timberland Company
200 Domain Drive
Stratham, NH 3885
United States of America

Dr. David Hudson
HESC
Univ. of Delaware
541 S. College Ave. 150 Rust Arena Unversity of Delaware ,
Newark, DE 19716
United States of America

Dr. Kazuyuki Mito
Department of System Engineerings
The University of Electro-Communications
1-5-1 Chofugaoka
Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585
Japan

Mr. Daniel Herman
Biomedical Engineering
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
12 Keswick Ct.
Durham, NC 27713
United States of America

Dr. Tetsunari Nishiyama
Human Performance Laboratory
Nippon Sport Science University
Fukasawa 7-1-1
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8508
Japan

Mr. takahide baba
osaka university of health and sports science
ojicho-motomach-2-3-9 apartment MiyabiD-201
Nara, 636-0013
Japan

Mr. Jeremy Determan
Sole Technology Institute
Sole Technology Inc.
20162 Windrow Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
United States of America

Frances Sheehan
Physical Disabilities Branch
National Institutes of Health
Physical Disabilities Branch, CC 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 201A MSC 5468
Bethesda, MD 20892-5468
United States of America

Mr. Karl Orishimo
Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma
130 E. 77th Street, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10021
United States of America

Benjamin Heilman
School of Podiatric Medicine
Temple University
148 North Eighth Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
United States of America

Dr. Toshiharu Yokozawa
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences
University of Tsukuba
1-1-1 Tennodai
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574
Japan

Mr. Yasushi Koyama
Graduate School of Human Sciences
Waseda university
Minamiyoshikata1-100
Tottori, 680-0843
Japan

Mr. Aaron Derouin
Kinesiology
University of Windsor
3167 Donnely St
Windsor, N9C 4E1
Canada

Ms. Julie Matthews
Kinesiology
University of New Brunswick
76 Caribou Rd.
Corner Brook, NL A2H 4X3
Canada

 

Mr. Alvin Au
39 Grenbeck Drive
Toronto, M1V 2H5
Canada

Dr. David Lee
Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
Harvard University, Concord Field Station
100 Old Causeway Rd
Bedford, MA 1730
United States of America

Mr. Le Li
Rehabilitation Engineering Centre
The HongKong Polytechnic University
S103, Dept.of REC, The HongKong Polytechnic University, HungHom
HongKong, NA
China

Ms. Qing Wang
Rehabilitation Engineering Centre
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Rm S103 Rehabilitation Engineering Centre The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hung Hom, Kowloon
Hong Kong

Mr. Jason Cheung
Rehabilitation Engineering Centre
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
S103, Rehabilitation Engineering Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, NA
Hong Kong

Mr. Sukhoon Yoon
Kinesiology
Texas Woman's University
2020 Stock Bridge Road APT# 5107
Denton, Texas 76208
United States of America

Mr. Syn Schmitt
Theoretical Astrophysics / Biomechanics
University Tuebingen
Boehmerwaldstrasse 19
Weil der Stadt, 71263
Germany

Miss veerle segers
Department of Movement and Sport Sciences
University Ghent
Watersportlaan 2
Gent, Belgium 9000
Belgium

Mr. Didier Staudenmann
Kinesiology
Vrije Universiteit, Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences
Van der Boechorststraat 9
Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1081 BT
Netherlands

Dr. Munier Hossain
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
Ysbyty Gwynedd
Flat 138, Judkin Court Heol Tredwen
Cardiff, CF10 5AX
United Kingdom

Dr. Kjartan Halvorsen
Biomechanics and Motor Control
Stockholm University College of Physical Education and Sports
Upplandsgt 71
Stockholm, 11328
Sweden

Christopher Neville
University of Rochester
106 Meigs Street
Rochester, NY 14607
United States of America

Bill Anderst
Bone and Joint Research
Henry Ford Health System
2799 W. Grand Blvd, ER 2015
Detroit, MI 48202
United States of America

Miss Jamie Lukos
Kinesiology
University of Michigan
543 Church Street, Apt. 5
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
United States of America

Dr. David Pearsall
Kinesiology & Physical Education
McGill University
475 Pine Avenue West
Montreal, Quebec H2W 1S4
Canada

Miss Jen Di Domizio
Kinesiology and Health Science
York University
4700 Keele Street Kinesiology and Health Science Bethune College
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Mr. Steve Brown
Department of Kinesiology
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave West
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1
Canada

Dr. Saryn Goldberg
Physical Disabilities Branch
National Institutes of Health
National Institutes of Health, Rehab Medicine Department, Bldg 10 CRC Rm 1-1469, 10 Center Drive MSC 1604
Bethesda, MD 20892-1604
United States of America

Dr. Linda McLean
School of Rehabilitation Therapy
Queen's University
Louise D Acton Building 31 George Street
Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6
Canada

Prof. Jason Gillette
Health and Human Performance
Iowa State University
245 Forker Building
Ames, Iowa 50011-1160
United States of America

Dr. Michele Oliver
School of Engineering
University of Guelph
School of Engineering, University of Guelph,
Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
Canada

Mr. Joel Jack
Biophysics
University of Guelph
236 Gordon St. Apt. 29
Guelph, Ontario N1G 1X3
Canada

Ms. Boon Kam
Mechanical Engineering & Orthopedic Surgery
University of Louisville
University of Louisville Ortho. Bioeng. Laboratory 500 S Preston St Instructional Building B - R128
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
United States of America

Dr. Byung Hoon Woo
Kinesiology
PennState University
39 Biomechanics Lab. Rec Bldg
University Park, PA 16802
United States of America

Prof. Mary Lou Bareither
Movement Sciences
Univeristy of Illinois at Chicago
901 W. Roosevelt Road M/C 194
Chicago, Illinois 60608
United States of America

Mr. Jimmy Su
4512 Dusik Ln.
Austin, TX 78746
United States of America

Dr. Ben Stansfield
Bioengineering Unit
University of Strathclyde
Wolfson Centre, 106 Rottenrow
Glasgow, Strathclyde G4 0NW
United Kingdom

Mr. Taylor Murphy
School of Engineering
University of Guelph
88 James St. W
Guelph, ON N1G 1E6
Canada

Prof. Ming-Shaung Ju
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
National Cheng Kung University
1 Ta-Hsueh Rd., Mechanical Engineering Building Room 91727
Tainan, Taiwan 701
Taiwan

Mr. Zaid Hasasneh
Biomedical Engineering
Cleveland State University/Cleveland Clinic Foundation
6677 Bramblewood LN
Mayfield Village, OHIO 44143
United States of America

 

Rahman Davoodi
Biomedical Engineering
University of Southern California
1042 West 36th Place DRB-101
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States of America

Mr. Phu Hoang
School of Physiotherapy
University of Sydney
11 kerslake Avenue
Sydney, NSW 2143
Australia

Mr. Shuo Yang
Mechanical Engineering &Orthopaedic Surgery
University of Louisville
204 Nob Hill Ln #6
Louisville, KY 40206
United States of America

Mr. Michael El-Shammaa
Motion Analysis Center
Children's Memorial Hospital
2300 Children's Plaza, Box 92
Chicago, IL 60614
United States of America

Mr. Joong-Hyun Ryu
Kinesiology
Texas woman's universiy
2100 spencer rd APT #2420
Denton, Texas 76205
United States of America

Mr. Scott Lynn
School of PHED
Queen's University
9-90 Toronto St.
Kingston, Ontario K7L 4A6
Canada

Mr. Erik Cattrysse
Experimental Anatomy
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Laarbeeklaan 103
Brussels, B1090
Belgium

Dr. Jos Vanrenterghem
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Science
Liverpool John Moores University, UK
Henry Cotton Building 15-21 Webster Street
Liverpool, L3 2ET
United Kingdom

Miss Anneleen De Cock
Movement and sports sciences
Ghent University
Watersportlaan 2
Ghent, 9000
Belgium

keith friedman
p.o. box 6347
santa barbara, ca 93160
United States of America

Mr. Shouchen Dun
1932-C Tree Top Lane
Vestavia Hills, Alabama 35216
United States of America

Prof. Koichi Shinkoda
Division of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Sciences
Hiroshima University Graduate School of Health Sciences
2-3, Kasumi 1-chome, Minami-ku
Hiroshima, 734-8551
Japan

Ms. Stacey Meardon
Health and Human Performance
Iowa State University
723 20th Street
Des Moines, IA 50314
United States of America

Mr. Thomas Coulter
Drexel University
541 South 46th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19143
United States of America

Prof. Hideki Toji
School of Human Science and Environment
University of Hyogo
1-1-12 Shinzaike-honcho
Himeji, Hyogo 670-0092
Japan

Mr. Tony Pasquali
Program and Coach development
Bluearth Institute
Level 5, 1A Bowen Cres
Melbourne, Victoria 3004
Australia

Mr. Ralph Howald
Joint Biomechanics
Zimmer GmbH
Sulzer Allee 8
Winterthur, 8404
Switzerland


Image

 

Image